THIS IS WHY
I don’t drink alcohol
By David Woodbury
Recently I
sat across the dinner table with a very attractive 20+ young woman as she
explained to me how she was taking care of herself by being careful about the
correct food she ate and the chemicals she would not use on her skin. She had
beautiful, clear white skin and pearly white teeth testifying to the strict
regime she applied to her way of living; all the while she held a glass of wine
in her hand.
After
commending her on the way she cared for herself I asked the question: So you don’t mind putting into your brain
the same chemical that is used these days as motor vehicle fuel? Naturally,
there was a pause in the conversation and I think the connection I made was not
lost.
It got me
thinking as to why it was that I don’t drink alcohol when it is so much an
accepted part of the Australian culture? A number of reasons spring to mind and
some have to do with a strict Salvation Army upbringing. As a teenager, I
signed my Articles of War in which I
covenanted not to use alcohol or tobacco; a good start in life. However, as one
matures you must develop a mature and rational attitude to abstinence.
Given the
extensive and convincing research that is available today into the abuse of
alcohol and tobacco, it is glaringly obvious that William and Catherine Booth
were ahead of their age when they
understood the ravages alcohol abuse could bring and insisted those wishing to be Salvationists must abstain from their use. We have held this to be a staunch condition for soldiership. But I’m not so sure in this day and age we are willing to still hold this as one of our core values, and I suspect it may well be one the reasons for the decline in the number of soldiers on our roles.
Conceivably, in our rush to relevance, we have been willing to dilute our stand on the matter and turn a blind eye to the increasing use of alcohol among those in corps leadership, possibly to the point of encouraging it use by our tolerance. What we need to understand is that The Salvation Army will never be a big number organisation simply because it places a high bar, as did our Founders, on membership.
understood the ravages alcohol abuse could bring and insisted those wishing to be Salvationists must abstain from their use. We have held this to be a staunch condition for soldiership. But I’m not so sure in this day and age we are willing to still hold this as one of our core values, and I suspect it may well be one the reasons for the decline in the number of soldiers on our roles.
Conceivably, in our rush to relevance, we have been willing to dilute our stand on the matter and turn a blind eye to the increasing use of alcohol among those in corps leadership, possibly to the point of encouraging it use by our tolerance. What we need to understand is that The Salvation Army will never be a big number organisation simply because it places a high bar, as did our Founders, on membership.
Unfortunately,
we live in a culture where excessive consumption of alcohol is not only
tolerated but actively encouraged as a rite of passage. The reality is that
community tolerance and standards are not always the best measuring stick for
our communities and there are times when Christians need to speak out and set
an example when such community tolerance and standards are flawed.
Perhaps it
is time we took stock of our attitude and reflected on the reality of the abuse
of the substance, and the enormous social and emotional cost to family and
community, and perhaps admit, even grudgingly, that William and Catherine were
spot on.
In
2004-2005 the cost of alcohol abuse in Australia was calculated at $15 Billion.
By 2010 the figures had more than doubled as reported in an article by Danny
Rose in The Sydney Morning Herald of 24 August 2010. He writes that: Police and doctors’ groups say a report
showing the massive human toll, and $36 billion annual cost, from alcohol
misuse is a wake-up call for government and the Australian community.
It has been
well documented and long known that alcohol consumption has a significant
effect on the developing brains of teenagers and young adults, with experts
saying that the brain is not fully developed until around 25 years of age. One
can only speculate that the common sense reaction to this scientific
information would be to increase the drinking age from 18 to 25.
Forbes
Magazine of 8 June 2017 says that: a new
study, out in the BMJ [British Medical Journal] this week, throws some more
evidence to that side of the debate: It finds that moderate drinking may also
not be so innocuous when it comes to brain health.
In a world
awash with substance abuse with all attendant evils, and bearing in mind the catastrophic
impacts that flow from such abuse, I believe that Christians are still called
upon to be a light in the darkness of such turmoil. Some part of the Christian church has to make
a clear and understood statement that you can live a full and happy life
without the use of alcohol. Such a sacrifice, if you must call it that, may
well be part of taking up our cross daily and following Him who is the Light of
the World.
I am firmly
convicted, that given all these facts and our historical stand, that part of
the Christian church should be, no! Must be, The Salvation Army.
Comments
Post a Comment