SMALL IS BETTER THAN
JUST OK
By David Woodbury.
I
notice a recent Facebook post by Others’ journalist,
Lauren Martin which read: The
evangelistic effectiveness of mini-churches is statistically 1,600 percent greater
than that of the mega churches. (Quote from Natural Church Development by Christian Schwartz) The fact didn’t
surprise me, the percentage did.
Salvationist
have long known that serving in a small corps is often the catalyst in
meaningful ministry. For many years, the larger number of cadets entering our
traIning college came from small, often rural, corps. I suspect that there was a
unique spiritual dynamic present, and there was something different about these
corps that was a catalyst in the spiritual impact and development on
individuals.
I
believe this to be true from my own experience. I grew up in a large city corps
complete with all its Army sections. There wasn’t a day in the week when there
wasn’t something happening at the Army. It was an active, family-friendly corps
just bursting with life.
As
life developed and marriage and family eventuated we made the move from the
city to a coastal town to commence a business enterprise. The local corps was
somewhat of a shock. Reasonably small, with struggling sections. It wasn’t long
before Jeanette and I took on roles in the corps and found ourselves heavily
involved. As it is in smaller communities personalities and problems become
more apparent and tensions and unrest became part of corps life.
Not
used to these sort of tensions we felt that maybe a change to another church
would be advisable for the whole family which now included three children.
Consequently, we turned up one Sunday morning to one of the big denominations
in the area. Sitting in the row ahead of us were a number of our fellow
Salvationist. Although I don’t remember anything that went on that morning I
clearly recall God telling me this was not where he wanted me.
Life
went on and we faithfully fulfilled our roles as local officers in the corps
yet still with a sense of unrest. Both Jeanette and I had felt the call to
full-time ministry as Salvation Army officers in our late teens, but for
various reasons had avoided a response. For you see, it is easy to hide in a large
congregation. Many of the good and positive aspects of a large Christian
community can also be the distractions, and while the voice of God is heard,
there are so many options that response to it can be selective.
But
here, in the grassroots, nuts and bolts struggle in a much smaller corps, there
are fewer places to hide from God. The struggle, the unrest, the conflicting
personalities all became catalysts in confronting us with obedience to the call
of God on our lives. We sold home and business, and along with our three
children entered the training college and spent the rest of our lives as
Salvation Army officers.
As
I write this, some 40 years later, I am acutely aware of the hand of God on my
life and stand in awe in the way He has led me. I firmly believe it was that
experience in that small Christian community that brought me to the place of
obedience and surrender to God’s will for my life. I can’t prove Schwartz 1,600
percent, but this I know, the small corps, the small church, the small
Christian communities are crucial in God’s plan of salvation for all humanity.
Now
here is where I find a great deal of concern with today’s current religious
trends, even those within The Salvation Army. If Schwartz is right, and I am
sure he is, why are we closing small corps and trying to amalgamate them into a
large congregation? If the most effective evangelical work originates in small
corps, why aren’t we creating more of them?
I
suspect that closure of small corps has more to do with economics, and if that
is so, does it indicate an unwillingness to actively invest in evangelism? Or
it may be that there are leadership agendas strongly attached to historic
church growth decisions made, that leadership will not acknowledge as failure.
If that is the case some honest Christian and ethical accountability needs to
occur.
Possibly
we have been deluded and led astray by the myth of the mega-church. For some
decades officers from the erstwhile Eastern Territory were intentionally sent
to the US to study and observe the principles and practices of some of these
mega-churches. Although some may have benefited from personal development, the
only measurable result was the closure of some small corps and a decrease in soldiership
and meeting attendances.
The
time has come when we need to honestly and ruthlessly review some of the
decisions that have been made in this area of growth and admit, that despite
our best intentions, we simply got it wrong. It may well be that if we can
truly and honestly face up to our mistakes, God may once again bring us back to
an effective fighting force that is The Salvation Army.
There
are times when small is better than just OK – it may well be the will of God.
Then if my people who are called by my name will
humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their
wicked ways, I will hear from heaven and will forgive their sins and restore
their land. (2
Chronicles 7:14 – NLT)
In my experience the struggles of small corps can result from trying to do what larger corps do, with all their resources, instead of focusing on what can be done well with the resources they've got. This however requires mature and spiritually developed leadership which these corps have often been denied due to frequent changes of often young and inexperienced officers. The issues of large corps/small corps, which seem to beset the SA, do not seem to affect other denominations in the same way. Is this because sacramentally focused worship does not require large bands and songster brigades, or even church choirs, to be effective and meaningful to participants? Has our love of music in worship resulted in a drift to an entertainment expectancy in our meetings for too many of our members? These are questions which I feel are pertinent to the condition the Army finds itself in today.
ReplyDelete